Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sean Sakamoto's avatar

I wonder if it’s a matter of a clear voice. A24 movies all feel like part of the same vision. BuzzFeed felt like “content” more than “writing” or “journalism.” It was optimized for engagement.

If I see that a film is an A24 movie I know what that means. Blumhouse is another. But Paramount? It could be anything.

Authors have a voice, auteur directors have a voice, and substack allows writers to have a clear voice as well. As larger media companies use focus groups and metrics to drive their content, they widen their appeal but lose a distinctive quality.

When something is distinctive it becomes a more intimate experience and that intimacy drives fandom.

That’s my theory. I’m making it up as I write it too, so maybe I’m off. I love the thought-provoking piece, thank you.

Expand full comment
Gérard Mclean's avatar

It’s not just personalities and journalism and books where the middle is being ignored, eschewed, shunned... well, you know .. but in business, too. I have to lease servers for the stuff I do and my choices are now either DIY servers from AWS, Google Cloud, Azure with no support OR full service $50K a month white glove... no middle. None. Zip. Nada. Nothing. Lots of need, though, but not enough money to make any VC profitable. Nobody wants to provide anything for the middle anymore! Not enough money in it for the effort.

That is the same problem twitter had; they were the middle of the socials. They filled a huge need but they didn’t generate enough money. Nobody would actually PAY to use twitter, but they didn’t have enough reach to be a huge player yet were filling a need too big to be a small player. It’s no wonder the board pre-Elon wanted out!! I’d want out, too.

Same with Buzzfeed.. and Vice, and every second tier newspaper like the Plain Dealer, Blade, Dispatch, DDN...

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts